ASSOCIATED PRESS
October 11, 2006
http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20061011/news_1n11gaywed.html
Post your new Federal Privacy Law and explain what you think would happen during the possible process of judicial review
Every man and woman has the right to privacy within their homes, and social and business affairs unless suspected of a crime and have a warrant. The government cannot go through anyone’s privacy/property without a warrantor the owners permission. To get a warrant you must take it to court with evidence and the warrant would last only one year.
In 2006, a gay couple was turned down by the Supreme Court, TWICE in 2004 they were refused to a wedding license but they tried again and they were refused again. “A San Francisco judge last year declared the state marriage ban invalid because it violated the civil rights of gays and lesbians.”
This connects to the class because it’s talking about how this couple doesn’t have the rights to get married. This really connect because this situation is just two men in love and as they are citizens of the UNITED STATES they are able to have the right to get married and that shouldn’t be the governments problem. These men want to have their “privacy” and the government shouldn’t be in this situation. These men should have the rights as just regular “straight” men do.
What I think about this, I just can believe that the supreme court denied their love and they couldn’t get married and I think that, that’s wrong because they done have the privacy they want because the government is going into this situation.
No comments:
Post a Comment